[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Re: Course <->topic [was: UU database: problem tables]
Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh wrote:
Alexey Parshin wrote:
Still, the question "Should we drop the course entity and replace it
with topic" still not answered.
Yes it was, if you read all the thread. The answer was "umm, maybe" ;-)
My answer was "no, absolutely not" in terms of user interface, UMO. From
programming point of view: you design classes and their relations that
you find suitable. I remember, you almost agreed on Topic to be parent
class for Course - fine with me. End-user has to have both to manage as
traditionally as possible.
And, I still see no reason for limiting a course to a single topic.
I can see a course with multiple topics, and don't see any problems
with it.
From database schema POV it doesn't make _much_ difference. However, looking
at the model layer classes, it's apparent, that we'd have to duplicate
bunch of
functions if we had topic and class as two completely separate things: i.e.
all child enumeration functions, modifications, etc. If you look at
"Course" as
a topic with extra functionality (some specific administrative stuff),
you don't
need to do anything extra.
2006/9/26, Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh <ilya@total-knowledge.com
<mailto:ilya@total-knowledge.com>>:
Alexey Parshin wrote:
> 2006/9/26, Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh <ilya@total-knowledge.com
<mailto:ilya@total-knowledge.com>
> <mailto:ilya@total-knowledge.com
<mailto:ilya@total-knowledge.com>>>:
>
> On a related note, problem (just like any other object actually)
> can belong to more then one topic, more then one test, etc.
> Same is true for topic->subtopic relationship.
>
> On the other hand, there is 0-1:1 relationship between
course and
> topic. I.E. like we talked about earlier, course is just an
> administrative
> unit, wrapping single top-level topic.
>
>
> Why a course may have only one topic? I probably missed
something, but
> I see no reason why course may not have several topics..
Otherwise, we
> don't need two entities for the same thing.
>
Read this thread:
http://www.total-knowledge.com/progs/uu/archive/msg00078.html
--
Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh
Total Knowledge. CTO
http://www.total-knowledge.com
--
Alexey Parshin,
http://www.sptk.net
--
Anatoly Volynets, Co-Founder
total-knowledge.com
culturedialogue.org