UniverseUniversity


Home Projects Jobs Clientele Contact

uu


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: keywords



Are there any plans on weighting the keywords?

Alexey Parshin wrote:
> Here are my conclusions:
>
> 1) It is author's duty to maintain these keywords especially if object
> has multiple versions. As far as I understand, the small number of
> keywords isn't sufficient, and the large number is impossible to
> maintain.
> 2) If the keywords are not taken from the text or something displayed
> along with the text - they don't associate with the object as possible
> search conditions.
>
> Conclusions:
> 1) We don't need an artificial set of keywords that are not a part of
> the object.
> 2) Keywords should be generated automatically from the object text.
> 3) If author needs something that associates an object or its part
> with keywords, the author should provide a short description of the
> object or its part in the object text.
> 4) Auto-generation should happen automatically after any object
> content modification. Keywords themselves are not humanly editable.
>
> If we implement keywords this way, it would be zero efforts to
> maintain these keywords, and no logical inconsistencies when a set of
> keywords doesn't match the object content.
>
> 2006/11/15, sergey@total-knowledge.com
> <mailto:sergey@total-knowledge.com> <sergey@total-knowledge.com
> <mailto:sergey@total-knowledge.com>>:
>
>
>     > 5. What if UU creates its own keyword list, asks the author to
>     edit it
>     > and does not let it go, until the author adds at least one word not
>     > listed?
>     >
>     > 6. Shouldn't the keyword list to be structured in some way?
>     >
>     > 7. How keyword lists are updated? Depending on events in each
>     category
>     > the UMO belongs to? This does bring in the idea of structured
>     keyword
>     > list.
>
>     Regarding structuring.
>
>     1. Automaticaly generated keywords for the current UMO.
>     2. All "current UMO"'s children UMOs keywords(if any)
>     3. Author's custom keywords(if any)
>
>     From UI point of view, all keywords will be displayed in the same text
>     area Keywords.
>     From DB point of view, it's up to Alexey to deside. Here is my humble
>     opinion:
>     We may add keywords field to every *_content table where we may store
>     author's custom keywords, automaticaly generated keywords will be
>     stored
>     in keywords_list table. This will allow keywords to be part of the
>     UMO
>     versioning.
>
>
>
>     > --
>     >
>     > Anatoly Volynets, Co-Founder
>     > total-knowledge.com <http://total-knowledge.com>
>     > culturedialogue.org <http://culturedialogue.org>
>     >
>     >
>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Alexey Parshin,
> http://www.sptk.net 

-- 
Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh
Total Knowledge. CTO
http://www.total-knowledge.com


Authoright © Total Knowledge: 2001-2008