[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Re: UU code
Yes, if the db and app servers are on different machines.
And if our initial pool implementation is noop, we get best
of both worlds.
Alexey Parshin wrote:
> Actually, postgres connection is somewhat around 50ms. Does it worth
> to create a connection pool then?
>
> 2007/3/14, Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh < ilya@total-knowledge.com
> <mailto:ilya@total-knowledge.com>>:
>
> Correct. We _could_ optimize it a bit by hooking up session
> IDs with that, but I am not sure it's worth the effort for now.
>
> In our particular case, we could simplify and abstract our code
> a bit by making connection pool itself take care of that.
> I.E. function that would return connection from pool, would
> have to take application user credentials of some form.
>
> Alexey Parshin wrote:
> > Please, remember, that security is connection-specific. If we gonna
> > implement connection pooling - then the first operation on every
> page
> > should be login(username,password).
> >
> > 2007/3/14, Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh < ilya@total-knowledge.com
> <mailto:ilya@total-knowledge.com>
> > <mailto: ilya@total-knowledge.com
> <mailto:ilya@total-knowledge.com>>>:
> >
> > Yes to CDatabase vs. CODBCDatabase.
> > No to connection per session.
> > High volume web applications cannot do that, since there are
> > usually many many more inactive sessions, then sessions
> > actually accessing database at any given time.
> >
> > The correct way to do it is to have database connection pool.
> > Database connections are retrieved from it and returned when
> > they are used. No database connection is guaranteed to preserve
> > state between requests. Luckily we do not have complex
> transactions
> > that span more then one request and could be rolled back in any
> > sane manner.
> >
> > Alexey Parshin wrote:
> > > Also, it isn't enough to have db handle to work with the
> > database. We
> > > (in ideal case) should have CDatabase object staying alive
> > through the
> > > whole session. I'm not sure - where to keep it, but it
> shoul be
> > > connected with the session data. Does it make sense?
> > >
> > > 2007/3/14, Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh
> <ilya@total-knowledge.com <mailto:ilya@total-knowledge.com>
> > <mailto: ilya@total-knowledge.com
> <mailto:ilya@total-knowledge.com>>
> > > <mailto: ilya@total-knowledge.com
> <mailto:ilya@total-knowledge.com>
> > <mailto: ilya@total-knowledge.com
> <mailto:ilya@total-knowledge.com>>>>:
> > >
> > > No.
> > >
> > > sergey@total-knowledge.com
> <mailto:sergey@total-knowledge.com>
> > <mailto: sergey@total-knowledge.com
> <mailto:sergey@total-knowledge.com>>
> > <mailto:sergey@total-knowledge.com
> <mailto:sergey@total-knowledge.com>
> > <mailto:sergey@total-knowledge.com
> <mailto:sergey@total-knowledge.com>>> wrote:
> > > >> Servlet has a virtual init() method, that you can
> override.
> > > There you
> > > >> can create your pool instance and store it in
> ServletContext
> > > attribute.
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > In order to do that my libdm' uudb class should extend
> > > HttpServlet and be
> > > > servlet itself. Is it right way to do it?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> --
> > > >> Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh
> > > >> Total Knowledge. CTO
> > > >> http://www.total-knowledge.com
> > <http://www.total-knowledge.com>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh
> > > Total Knowledge. CTO
> > > http://www.total-knowledge.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Alexey Parshin,
> > > http://www.sptk.net < http://www.sptk.net>
> >
> > --
> > Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh
> > Total Knowledge. CTO
> > http://www.total-knowledge.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Alexey Parshin,
> > http://www.sptk.net
>
> --
> Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh
> Total Knowledge. CTO
> http://www.total-knowledge.com
>
>
>
>
> --
> Alexey Parshin,
> http://www.sptk.net
--
Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh
Total Knowledge. CTO
http://www.total-knowledge.com
- References:
- UU code
- From: sergey@total-knowledge.com
- Re: UU code
- From: "Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh" <ilya@total-knowledge.com>
- Re: UU code
- From: sergey@total-knowledge.com
- Re: UU code
- From: "Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh" <ilya@total-knowledge.com>
- Re: UU code
- From: sergey@total-knowledge.com
- Re: UU code
- From: "Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh" <ilya@total-knowledge.com>
- Re: UU code
- From: "Alexey Parshin" <alexeyp@gmail.com>
- Re: UU code
- From: "Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh" <ilya@total-knowledge.com>
- Re: UU code
- From: "Alexey Parshin" <alexeyp@gmail.com>
- Re: UU code
- From: "Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh" <ilya@total-knowledge.com>
- Re: UU code
- From: "Alexey Parshin" <alexeyp@gmail.com>