Home Projects Jobs Clientele Contact


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: keywords

So be it, although, as a user, I feel a bit uncomfortable not having access to my UMO keyword lists.

Alexey Parshin wrote:
There is one important outcome of this argument. The keywords should be
connected to the UMO' content and not to UMO itself. This way we may use
content' version and language as search criteria.
I've just committed corresponding changes in the schema.

2006/11/15, Alexey Parshin <alexeyp@gmail.com>:

I would like to avoid an extra field. At least, as a database
construction. If author really wants to push certain keywords not mentioned
anywhere in the text - he can add an annotation with such words.
Normally - it should be not necessary. I see no use in keywords not used
in the text unless these keywords are trying to describe a binary object. But then we better provide a text description of such object anyway. Here is
the example:

<umo title="Great Wall of China>
<text> This is the only object build by Humanity that can be seen from the Moon. This is BS, BTW. I tried to look it up in Google maps and had a hard
time finding it.
<attachment type="picture" file="GreatWall.jpg"
<annotation> The picture of The Great Wall taken in 1999 from the plane
<keywords> Big Grey Wall </keywords>
<text>... </text>

While indexing this fragment, we may collect all the keywords from <text> tag contents. We may ignore everything from <attachment> but <annotation>
and <keywords> contents.
Now, if the author removes a picture from this UMO, the keywords are
rebuilt, and we have no reference on that picture in the keywords anymore
(in this version of the UMO).

2006/11/15, sergey@total-knowledge.com <sergey@total-knowledge.com>:
> > 3) If author needs something that associates an object or its part
> with
> > keywords, the author should provide a short description of the object
> or
> > its
> > part in the object text.
> We cannot just tell author to provide a short description of the object
> somewhere. UI has to have required field for that purpose, for example
> Short Description. But in this case we get back to having additional
> field
> again(that purpose was served by Keywords field).
> If you intend to use, for example, course Content field for keywords
> generation, you may end up with generation a bunch of unrelated
> keywords.
> >
> > --
> > Alexey Parshin,
> > http://www.sptk.net
> >

Alexey Parshin,


Anatoly Volynets, Co-Founder

Authoright © Total Knowledge: 2001-2008