Home Projects Jobs Clientele Contact


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: DB structure: Dialog of Texts (DoT)

What I mean is that single text within DoT may not actually be separable.
I.E. one cannot reference separate text, and thus there is no need to have
separate ACL. Access to whole dialog object applies to separate pieces
of it as well.

Also, important part of DoT functionality is cross-referencing between
How is this reflected in our database schema? (Take a look at Model-layer
to see sketch of what is intended).

Alexey Parshin wrote:
> IMHO, dialog of text logically should be connected to a topic. We do
> need an ACL for the texts, controlling editing, deleting, and MB even
> referencing (for the commercial server).
> 2006/10/18, Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh < ilya@total-knowledge.com
> <mailto:ilya@total-knowledge.com>>:
>     - Is dialog_of_texts really course-level thing?
>     Actually this is more of a question to Anatoly. Spec says
>     it's course-level object, but I suspect what is meant is that
>     DoT is at the same level as course (i.e. completely independent)
>     I guess it could be referenced from courses/topics/etc. in same
>     way as any other media object.... I think this needs more detailing
>     in specification.
>     - I'm not sure we really need separate ACL for texts_in_dialog
>     Again - needs clarification in spec - i.e. can texts be included
>     in different dialogs without being modified. Is cross-referencing
>     between texts in a dialog actually separate from texts themselves
>     (logically it can be, but does our data structure reflect that at
>     all?)
>     --
>     Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh
>     Total Knowledge. CTO
>     http://www.total-knowledge.com
> -- 
> Alexey Parshin,
> http://www.sptk.net 

Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh
Total Knowledge. CTO

Authoright © Total Knowledge: 2001-2008