[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Re: UU database: problem tables
2006/9/26, Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh <ilya@total-knowledge.com>:
Alexey Parshin wrote:
>
> Alexey Parshin wrote:
> > Actually,
> > I expected that single problem may be offered to many students,
> and
> > every student may have personal solution with personal access and
> > personal status.
> That is correct. However, status is not part of ACL entry. That is why
> they have to be separate
> tables. Basically status may stay ( i.e. for scoring purposes)
> even after
> student loses any access
> to the problem.
>
> Interesting. In this case,
> 1) The present structure, one problem -> many solutions(one per person
> or even many per person) is correct, isn't it? Please, confirm.
I actually didn't think about more then one solutions
per-person+problem, but I guess it is actually possible.
At least I don't see any good reason to limit database from allowing it.
> 2) Status isn't a part of the access and may stay even after a person
> lost the access to the object. It may be: not started, working on,
> completed, failed.. Status may be a part of ACL only because it's
> convenient - we don't have to create a separate set of status tables
> for topic, problem, course etc..
Except status _is_ different, and may stay after access is revoked. So
it has to be in different tables.
Actually, revoking access completely is probably a rare case. We may want to revoke a modify access - after the object is completed by person.
We may even revoke access by indicating "no access" in ACL record, and still have status. If this happens rare - we can save space and gain performance.
If you still don't like it - then I'd create a set of status tables.
--
Alexey Parshin,
http://www.sptk.net