Re: Problems with umo_create

["Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh" <ilya@total-knowledge.com>]

I found the second function. What's the point of having
umo_create with type ID calling umo_create with type name, which
will then figure out type ID again?

Alexey Parshin wrote:
> Ok, that gives me more info. I'll look into it on the weekend.
>
> 2008/11/7 Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh <ilya@total-knowledge.com>
>
>   
>> That probably means one gets called where the other one should.
>> In the version of UU I set up locally, when I try to create any kind
>> of UMO through the interface, I get an error
>>
>> Object type (1) is invalid
>>
>> Alexey Parshin wrote:
>>     
>>> AFAIK, there are two versions of umo_create. One expects object type id,
>>>       
>> the
>>     
>>> othe one expects object type name.
>>>
>>> 2008/11/7 Alexey Parshin <alexeyp@gmail.com>
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Can you point to the place in C++ code?
>>>>
>>>> 2008/11/7 Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh <ilya@total-knowledge.com>
>>>>
>>>> There seems to be a discrepancy in what umo_create expects
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> and what it is given as first argument.
>>>>> C++ passes it object type ID, and the function expects object type
>>>>> name.
>>>>> At least that's the way things are in current SVN.
>>>>>
>>>>>    Ilya.
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>     
>
>
>