UniverseUniversity


Home Projects Jobs Clientele Contact

uu


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re:



I sow that in Ilya's message in Difficulty Level topic. See below

--------------
>> 2. This same UMO DL in the course or among courses by the same Author,
>> set by the Author.

> It seems that common consensus is that object DL should be bound to
> course. I guess
> we'll go with it then.

>
> --
> Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh
> Total Knowledge. CTO
> http://www.total-knowledge.com
>
>
---------------


> I don't remember that agreement, but I need two part difficulty level
> (one part set for Repository by community, another  set within the
> course or between courses of this author by this author) as I described
> it.


I was talking about Author's part of difficulty level in DB schema, not
Repository's.

>
> sergey@total-knowledge.com wrote:
>> If i understood it correctly, we agreed that difficulty level should be
>> bound to a Course. Imho it's reflected in the latest DB schema.
>>
>>
>>
>>> I have added study_course, study_course_acl, and study_course_payment
>>> to
>>> support our discussion results.
>>> However - I'm not really sure if the relation between topic (TLT) and
>>> study_course is right. Currently, top-level-topic owns course. The
>>> alternative is - course owns all the topics inside.
>>> Also, I'm not sure yet how to control access to payments.
>>>
>>> 2006/12/14, sergey@total-knowledge.com <sergey@total-knowledge.com>:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> 3. Assign Course or any other UMO within a Course to a Student.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> What that means? Recommendation or administration? If latter - see
>>>>>> above.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I'd like to know that too :)
>>>>>
>>>> For example, assign a Problem to a Student
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> 4. Set grades(ratings) to a Student.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Same story. We don't have grades in specs.
>>>>>>
>>>>> We do have some ideas at least as far as grading problem solving
>>>>> goes.
>>>>> Most of it is automatic, but at least some is human-controlled. I
>>>>>
>>>> don't
>>>>
>>>>> care too much about grading abilities, but we'll need it eventually.
>>>>>
>>>> We
>>>>
>>>>> need better definition though. Or at least some definition, since
>>>>>
>>>> there
>>>>
>>>>> really isn't anything specific in the spec.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> 5. Assign Students to certain difficulty levels within a
>>>>>>> Course.(Student
>>>>>>> will be able to see only UMOs of certain difficulty level)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> All the same. It is all for student's discretion as of today.  We
>>>>>> can
>>>>>> probably think about some specific channels where students can find
>>>>>> recommendations not from teacher only. I am not sure there is need
>>>>>>
>>>> for
>>>>
>>>>>> this. We can discuss it though.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 6. Ability to change any UMO difficulty level within a Course(No
>>>>>>> new
>>>>>>> version should be created)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> np
>>>>>>
>>>>> No. Difficulty levels are author's responsibility.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> 7. Sets the price for a Course
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is necessary feature. I believe we have it in specs.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Teacher or Author?
>>>>>
>>>> Teacher sets the price, students buy it. Author? I don't know how
>>>> authors
>>>> make money, maybe teachers buy courses from authors then sell it to
>>>> students? No need to teach anything, just make a couple of
>>>> transactions.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> 8. Chooses his prefered language(s) for the Course from the list of
>>>>>>> available languages for this Course.
>>>>>>>
>>>>> Preferred for what? Expand on this please.
>>>>>
>>>> I mean his language(pl_preferred_language column in person_list
>>>> table).
>>>> Course may have several languages available, Author selects the one he
>>>> speaks. You don't want, for example, students send an Author problems
>>>> solutions in language different from the one he speaks.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> 9. Ability to hide(not update) from Student certain UMOs in the
>>>>>>>
>>>> Course
>>>>
>>>>>>> that he teaches.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Don't need it. Actually, there is one more issue here postponed for
>>>>>> future versions: work flow. It relates to administration, but not
>>>>>> entirely.
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh
>>>>> Total Knowledge. CTO
>>>>> http://www.total-knowledge.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Alexey Parshin,
>>> http://www.sptk.net
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
>
> Anatoly Volynets, Co-Founder
> total-knowledge.com
> culturedialogue.org
>
>



Authoright © Total Knowledge: 2001-2008