Home Projects Jobs Clientele Contact


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: UU: UMO catalogue

2009/1/11 Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh <ilya@total-knowledge.com>

> Alexey Parshin wrote:
> > At the moment, UMO creation time field doesn't exist. It is easy to add,
> but
> > then I have to add it as search criteria to umo_find() and
> homepage_element
> > table.
> >
> Let's do it.

Will do on Monday. Marked as TODO.

> > Presenting this information on the screen as a tree could be tricky since
> > UMO relations are more complicated than a tree. For instance, if UMO C is
> a
> > child of both A and C, how are you going to display it? Showing it twice
> > could be confusing, especially if user wants to delete a 'duplicate'.
> >
> You missed the whole point. We aren't talking about UMO parent-child
> relationships at all. This is separate categorization, which UMOs get for
> the purpose of browsing repository.

Well, may be you have to define the point, because currently I don't
understand how it's built.

> --
> Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh
> http://www.total-knowledge.com

Alexey Parshin,

Authoright © Total Knowledge: 2001-2008