[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Re: UU: UMO catalogue
2009/1/11 Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh <ilya@total-knowledge.com>
> Alexey Parshin wrote:
> > At the moment, UMO creation time field doesn't exist. It is easy to add,
> but
> > then I have to add it as search criteria to umo_find() and
> homepage_element
> > table.
> >
> Let's do it.
Will do on Monday. Marked as TODO.
>
> > Presenting this information on the screen as a tree could be tricky since
> > UMO relations are more complicated than a tree. For instance, if UMO C is
> a
> > child of both A and C, how are you going to display it? Showing it twice
> > could be confusing, especially if user wants to delete a 'duplicate'.
> >
> You missed the whole point. We aren't talking about UMO parent-child
> relationships at all. This is separate categorization, which UMOs get for
> the purpose of browsing repository.
Well, may be you have to define the point, because currently I don't
understand how it's built.
>
>
> --
> Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh
> http://www.total-knowledge.com
>
>
--
Alexey Parshin,
http://www.sptk.net