[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Re: UU: UMO catalogue
Alexey Parshin wrote:
> At the moment, UMO creation time field doesn't exist. It is easy to add, but
> then I have to add it as search criteria to umo_find() and homepage_element
> table.
>
Let's do it.
> Presenting this information on the screen as a tree could be tricky since
> UMO relations are more complicated than a tree. For instance, if UMO C is a
> child of both A and C, how are you going to display it? Showing it twice
> could be confusing, especially if user wants to delete a 'duplicate'.
>
You missed the whole point. We aren't talking about UMO parent-child
relationships at all. This is separate categorization, which UMOs get for
the purpose of browsing repository.
--
Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh
http://www.total-knowledge.com