[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Re: UU: Single-db-call philosophy
- To: uu@total-knowledge.com
- Subject: Re: UU: Single-db-call philosophy
- From: "Alexey Parshin" <alexeyp@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 08:27:40 +1100
- Delivered-to: mailing list uu@total-knowledge.com
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=UC1xq1mDnFmEFNYGu1QweqsFv8MiJ7rIn4MtvY7g/S0=; b=lWw1OCg2kMUSgZAn3dIDsTEKn3VShsGK0QWTqi99SVK87Vdo+sSDOLYF8CWVjT8d0c q8Tiwl5pUSwq6Drul4/s/spLCr/lVtlL2MijDgwRJLu+XbbyxCCk16cXDSBKvBkC0MyZ MYH95sGOC1CEB+iTuNs4W0/ZKk462VKhRcuVI=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=p1YdMoQt9PxQp1/QxRowJk3OU9zVI2+QbDXZxMa+cxG1DqqOtHBGnw9mhhEYivFumy yMppg9JyT96EGB1swr2m5qk6wwvqyoWbJGBcxdlLJdhAUSxDcRZLdLslBDun9UbQPbQ8 0RVvTDUeXLGkL4hUXYF5mGK+2KzCkxfGR/N20=
- In-reply-to: <4964F5C5.5090402@total-knowledge.com>
- Mailing-list: contact uu-help@total-knowledge.com; run by ezmlm
- References: <4964F5C5.5090402@total-knowledge.com>
Remember what I was trying to do in Slonic project - replace all the
sequences of SQL stmts with a single call?
I'd really prefer to join 'em together.
Speaking of these functions. Group_list_people() is understood. But what
should group_find_for_object() take as parameters and return?
2009/1/8 Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh <ilya@total-knowledge.com>
> I've run into another function pair that I need to call:
> group_find_for_object and group_list_people (seems like we
> don't have that one yet).
>
> Do we really want to create two-call wrapper functions
> for all such pairs, or do we want to delegate combining these
> things to C++?
>
> --
> Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh
> http://www.total-knowledge.com
>
>
--
Alexey Parshin,
http://www.sptk.net