[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Re: Object type dependencies
- To: uu@total-knowledge.com
- Subject: Re: Object type dependencies
- From: "Alexey Parshin" <alexeyp@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 07:24:05 +1100
- Delivered-to: mailing list uu@total-knowledge.com
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=HjZHiALiloLhB5bi9gZcYmTZ+ylMATH8T+3c7cYNBwY=; b=mKwYMEGLPkG5cpW22fxAKIJn65g7neI9Qfnyik5F/iw+c9CauGZhB1Fl2zurHO1C7p Zj4/Nr9+5uzfQJWNBPoVgB9InSJATtmbFwd8wzlzN+6Dg/l91rH+G4rQQSuR1Y2kYt7S UoBVcubJ3e/vLL+hIQlQNwS5Uk+7qi6/fah8g=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=e255aav2dvrg8NsnJ1MFCHfbbjlQq6peMCPEBgUJxNfN9nUU05kb75KOVAhGyZlzm2 FCso5pVl7xkFPdNBenGlx1JoKqmVuhlAkDLMM3YqmtMeDwpslNbOQWa2tIZoT/2V4Vyb 1E9jnfzELJBVHlDU8LffyH8ZiS2hJZJR4tEDg=
- In-reply-to: <4960D7EE.4010103@total-knowledge.com>
- Mailing-list: contact uu-help@total-knowledge.com; run by ezmlm
- References: <4960D7EE.4010103@total-knowledge.com>
It's faster to check 'can object be a child of ..' this way. Both approaches have pros and cons, though. However, current one does the job just fine, unless you know something..
2009/1/5 Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh
<ilya@total-knowledge.com>
Is there a reason why object type dependencies
(which objects types can be children of which object types)
is expressed as a column in object_types table, rather
then external table?
--
Alexey Parshin,
http://www.sptk.net