Alexey Parshin wrote:
Except that I want a function in UUServlet that'd just return corresponding RequestDispatcher*.2008/7/30 Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh <firstname.lastname@example.org <mailto:email@example.com>>So, you want to have something like:string csp = fullThemePath() + "HomeView.csp";?
Let me repeat: It's impossible to have more then one servlet redirect to the same view by design. If that happens,It's impossible to have more then one servlet redirect to same view page (by design).Well, when we send a request from servlet to some .csp - the request should already have the data, in order for csp to just display the data. If servlet sends this request to HomeView, it should store the data for HomeView in the request./// Retrieve data /// ... /// Send the request request.getRequestDispatcher(csp)->forward(request, response);Now, the thing I'm trying to avoid is generating data separately from the view. I want to prevent any code duplication. If we retrieve data in servlet, and store it in the request - then, for instance, both LoginServlet and RegistrationServlet sending request to HomeView should retrive data for HomeView not to mention that any page sending request to HomeView should do the same.
design is violated, and that should be fixed.OTOH, we might want to change design requirements slightly, and allow for such cases. However, if this occurs, servlets redirecting to common view should have a common ancestor, which should have common data gathering function. I'm not sure if this approach is good enough for what I want to do in the end.
Not really. There my be cases where display of errors will be bit more complex then just showing them all at theBTW, that error handling is almost transparent. The 'CString errors;' declaration is in the Header.csp, the display of the error is in the Footer.csp. All that is required is to add ',errors' to the list of print() parameters. So, this complexity is gone.
end of a page.
You are missing something you can't understand for a very simple reason: I didn't document some ofSo, IMHO performance or code complexity wise my approach is better. Do you have any other arguments? I'm afraid to miss something I don't understand yet.
my ideas for future theme design yet :) Ilya.
Authoright © Total Knowledge: 2001-2008