Re: UMO' license

[Anatoly Volynets <av@total-knowledge.com>]

Good point!

Generally speaking, all UMOs at Open server must go under just one
license, which we created after Open source model (although it is not
the same) and called authoright.

At the Closed server, ideally, they must have tool to come up with a
custom license. I believe the best way would be to use Creative Commons
mechanism. (http://creativecommons.org/)

Alexey Parshin wrote:
> Gentlemen,
>
> I'm thinking about new entity, 'license_type' that would cover the
> current
> UMO license algorithm. This is similar to subscription mechanism, and
> also
> accompanied with license_parameter_template (for constructing a Web page)
> and object_license_parameter (that contains  actual object parameters).
>
> For a free license, the license uses a simplified algorithm that does
> nothing :)
> For other types of licenses, the license algorithm will use the same
> approach, as we use for subscription. As result, the funds from author's
> account would move to the UMO' account he's trying to use.
>

-- 

Anatoly Volynets, Co-Founder
total-knowledge.com
culturedialogue.org