Since explanation is shareable, you need many-to-many between it and
topic anyways, and you can add extra field in there for sequence numbers.
Alexey Parshin wrote:
> It looks like the implementation of the sequence number requires a
> separate table. Do we need it that badly?
> 2006/10/19, Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh < email@example.com
> Anatoly Volynets wrote:
> > "Number is really associated with Topic, not with explanation,
> as an
> > explanation
> > can be shared between different topics." - the latest addition
> to specs.
> > I don't see how it is possible. Explanation is for THIS topic,
> > else. It can be shared like any other UMO, but no more, no less
> > that.
> Correct. And sequence of showing explanations is property of
> topics, not
> property of explanations.
> If I include your explanation in my topic, I can assign my own
> difficulty level
> and sequence number to it.
> Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh
> Total Knowledge. CTO
> Alexey Parshin,
Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh
Total Knowledge. CTO
Description: Binary data
Authoright © Total Knowledge: 2001-2008