to these points. Dialogue can be presented to user in following ways: * One text at a time, annotated with links to relevant "points"* As list of "points", with references to places in each text where these points are discussed * As interleaving texts, for cases where arguing texts are organized similarly enough for that to make sense."
A text in DoT can be just a one line saying. Hence, set of points, although sounds reasonable, can be an optional feature and probably for a next uu version. I don't see it a critical necessity.
Even a large chunk of text is not necessary to be broken in sections. We can think about this possibility as optional one.
I think DoT is presented:1. First of all, by its contents, each line-link consisting of: Piece Title, Title of the work it was taken from, Author's name, Presenter's name (almost like in a traditional collection) 2. Then each text, when we go there, is accompanied by "Links To" (see specs)
I believe it is quite enough to serve the original idea. -- Anatoly Volynets, Co-Founder total-knowledge.com culturedialogue.org
Authoright © Total Knowledge: 2001-2008