[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Re: Object type and UMO version
- To: uu@total-knowledge.com
- Subject: Re: Object type and UMO version
- From: Alexey Parshin <alexeyp@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 08:09:48 +1000
- Delivered-to: mailing list uu@total-knowledge.com
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=swbWpRuv0U6j2w2BaFsSI2VmxI/2o7YCrfWZAhZUd+k=; b=p3VnxEj39BI4+Xts7LXC9PmJnN8LDpVC6+iZYQtKsGX82fmhM3/MfcZ9ZUdlkiQxKm JUNnKveh66pzrDZnvGuL1pvzj259bZSWWG6WBT+Tx5a1y6ELUB6qb5+psPB5JYS5Lnv6 5+BybEq5nTFb2qkfHNN5m6qJtC3rLmri26I9k=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=M1lkN46dXJw0PycwMisk7r/5p/3ZF2UIxG8UXvHGMkLzVYF1IQfe0MtuWycgghAdWB gSy47RRhMmLxb5+2EN1eoEMM+1kRls5d6QH+Fnvke52/dufRylOksURqGiRUUXQ2DFx/ Baw2aLwJeeVtk5OCxkl+NhrHUbxi3lyFkETg0=
- In-reply-to: <4A1E927F.2060901@total-knowledge.com>
- Mailing-list: contact uu-help@total-knowledge.com; run by ezmlm
- References: <4A1E927F.2060901@total-knowledge.com>
Dunno, but (even it is logically incorrect) it saves an extra join
everywhere. So, we may have it in umo_base, but I still need it in
umo_version as a shortcut.
2009/5/28 Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh <ilya@total-knowledge.com>
> Why is object type stored in UMO version, rather
> then in UMO base table?
>
> --
> Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh
> http://www.total-knowledge.com
>
>
--
Alexey Parshin,
http://www.sptk.net