Re: Next round of DB discussion

["Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh" <ilya@total-knowledge.com>]

It's one of main features. Sorry. That's what we have in spec.

Alexey Parshin wrote:
> I hate many-to-many. Do we really need to have it for objects?
> Classical tree is way easier to maintain..
>
> 2006/9/30, Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh < ilya@total-knowledge.com
> <mailto:ilya@total-knowledge.com>>:
>
>     OK. Object - Object relationships. They are all many-to-many.
>
>     I.E. topic contains multiple problems. Yet problem can be used in
>     different topics
>     (i.e. in different courses). Same applies to Explanations,
>     topic-to-course, and
>     dialog-of-texts objects.
>
>     I don't remember about others.
>     Ah, yes, tests. (We need to add them - they are just collection of
>     problems, with extra
>     info related to how to pass them, etc - see model layer class
>     diagram).
>
>     --
>     Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh
>     Total Knowledge. CTO
>     http://www.total-knowledge.com
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Alexey Parshin,
> http://www.sptk.net 

-- 
Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh
Total Knowledge. CTO
http://www.total-knowledge.com